RSS

Karl and I are very pleased to be able to represent this very nice new neighbourhood in Happy Valley.

Choose your home, your lot, your custom features, and move into your dream home in about four months – or move into the show home today. It is both easy and affordable!  With spacious single family homes from $389,900 all the way to larger homes with detached suites for only $519,900 there is excellent value here!

Visit www.HomesAtHazelwood.ca for floorplans and more.
Read

For both detached homes and condos we continue to see a very slow softening in selling price, with the pace a bit faster for condos.  Overall, prices are down about 5% from the peak early this spring.  On the other hand, the volume of sales has been relatively steady over the last few months, the same as days on market.  To summarize, well priced properties are selling well.

 

Over the last 30 days, 232 single family houses were sold, down by 8 houses from last week.  The median price is down $6,050 to $547,950. The average house was on the market for 36 days. In the same time period, 124 condos were sold, up by 4 condos from last week.  The median price is down $3,000 to $270,000. The average condo was on the market for 43 days.

 

There are now 2,233 houses for sale, down by 20 from last week.  Condo inventory has fallen by 19 to 1081 suites.

Read

Wow, it just keeps getting less expensive to buy a home.  Five year fixed rate mortgages can now be found for as little as 3.27% for those with great credit.  That's pretty cheap money.  A variable rate mortgage could cost you as little as 2.2%.  That's even better, but with the five year rate so close, I would be tempted to lock in, pay a little more, but live with less stress.

Do you have an opinion on this?  If so, always feel fee to add your comments.
Read

Over the last 30 days, 254 single family houses were sold, down by 5 houses from last week.  The median price is up $13,050 to $558,050. The average house was on the market for 38 days.

 

In the same time period, 115 condos were sold, down by 20 condos from last week.  The median price is up $00 to $275,000. The average condo was on the market for 42 days.

 

There are now 2,283 houses for sale, down by 09 from last week.  Condo inventory has fallen by 5 to 1140 suites.

Read

MULLIN DEMEO ELECTRONIC LEGAL UPDATE - August 22, 2011
 
Most real estate purchases are made conditional on the buyer approving the results of a building inspection. Because most buyers are unable to determine whether a house is well built and structurally sound on their own, they rely on advice provided by qualified, licensed inspectors. However, what if the information and advice provided by the inspector turns out to be incorrect? A recent decision of the B.C. Supreme Court examined this exact scenario. 

In 2006 a prospective purchaser (hereafter the “Purchaser”) made a conditional offer to purchase a Victoria property. The offer was accepted by the sellers. One condition of the offer was that it was subject to the Purchaser’s approval of the results of an inspection; the Purchaser hired a local building inspector to inspect the property and, upon completing of his inspection, the inspector advised the Purchaser that there was a solid, complete foundation and only minor drainage problems with the house. In addition, when the sellers filled out the Property Disclosure Statement (the “PDS”) they indicated that they were not aware of any structural problems or moisture related problems with the house. Relying on that advice, and on the PDS, the Purchaser removed this condition in addition to all of the others and completed her purchase. 

After completion, the Purchaser discovered water damage in the house caused by significant cracking in parts of the foundation, and further discovered that the house was not in fact supported by a complete foundation. The costs of completing the necessary repair work were estimated at more than $30,000, so the Purchaser sued the building inspector alleging negligence as well as the sellers for misrepresentation. 

At the outset of the trial the Supreme Court judge quickly dismissed the case against the sellers. The judge reaffirmed that the PDS is not a warranty from the sellers to the buyers, and that in most instances the seller’s only obligation is to not mislead or lie on the PDS. The judge held that the sellers honestly did not know of the problems with the foundations, and therefore did not misrepresent anything on the PDS. Addressing the inspector’s liability, the judge noted that the “…purpose of securing a residential home inspection is to provide to a lay purchaser expert advice about substantial deficiencies in the property...” This expert advice helps the buyer determine whether or not to proceed with the purchase. In addition, the court noted that “…persons who hold themselves out as professional know they invite reliance, and create a risk of harm if….their advice is wrong”. 

The court emphasized that the inspector not only missed the fact that there were significant problems with the foundation, but he in fact positively asserted that the foundation was fine. This turned out to be incorrect. The Purchaser reasonably relied on the inspector’s expert advice, and suffered as a result of it. The Supreme Court ruled against the inspector and awarded damages emphasizing that real estate purchasers act reasonably when they rely on the advice of professionals, and those professionals are expected to provide advice that is reasonable in the circumstances. 

This discussion of building inspectors’ liability is intended only as a brief introduction to the subject. Should you have any questions or concerns with respect to this or any other aspect of real estate law, please contact Brendan Piovesan, Mullin DeMeo, at lawyers@mdlawcorp.com, or (250) 477-3327. 
Read

Even though the market feels a bit sluggish these last few weeks, this is normal for this time of year as those who are not on holidays are focused on getting the kids ready for back-to-school.  Taking that into consideration, things are pretty good with the volume of sales expected to be over 10% ahead of August 2010.
 
Over the last 30 days, 259 single-family houses were sold, down by 3 houses from last week.  The median price is down $13,050 to $545,000. The average house was on the market for 38 days.
 
In the same time period, 135 condos were sold, up by 6 condos from last week.  The median price is down $4,000 to $275,000. The average condo was on the market for 42 days.
 
There are now 2,292 houses for sale, down by 26 from last week.  Condo inventory has risen by 4 to 1145 suites.
Read

Right now we have two very separate markets for houses and for condos.  For the second week in row, both the volume and median pricing for single family homes in Victoria has increased.  Volume is quite strong – not what we would expect to see in our normally quiet summer months.  On the other hand, the condo market is showing results typical for this time of year.  Volume continues to drop, off about 30% from the peak this spring.  Pricing has softened as well, reacting to the over-supply in our market. 
 
Overall, there are lots of buyers out there, but with our high inventory levels, they can afford to be picky.   The simple message is price your property correctly and it will sell.  Overprice it, and you just help your competition sell theirs.
 
Over the last 30 days, 262 single family houses were sold, up by 3 houses from last week.  The median price is up $15,050 to $558,050. The average house was on the market for 40 days.
 
In the same time period, 129 condos were sold, down by 13 condos from last week.  The median price is down $13,500 to $279,000. The average condo was on the market for 43 days.
 
There are now 2,318 houses for sale, up by 08 from last week.  Condo inventory has risen by 37 to 1141 suites.
Read
MLS® property information is provided under copyright© by the Vancouver Island Real Estate Board and Victoria Real Estate Board. The information is from sources deemed reliable, but should not be relied upon without independent verification.